A Stop Is Not A Target

For a long time the scanner could tell you exactly where you were wrong on a trade. It could not tell you whether the trade was worth taking. We just fixed that.

A stop and a target feel like the same kind of thing — two lines on a chart, one below, one above. They are not. They answer completely different questions, and for a long time I had only built an honest answer to one of them.

That is the whole point of these notes: to show the parts that were wrong, not just the parts that worked. So here is one we fixed.

Two Questions, Not One

A stop answers one question: where am I wrong? It is structural. It comes off the chart — the low of the base, a moving average that has to hold, a percentage you refuse to risk past. If price closes below it, the reason you took the trade is gone. You leave. No debate.

A target answers something else entirely: is the reward even worth the risk? And for a long time, the scanner was answering that question with a number that had nothing to do with reward at all.

The Flaw We Were Living With

The honest version: the scanner did not really have a target. The closest thing it had was one blunt reference — the 52-week high — applied to every name, regardless of what was actually sitting between the stock and that level. A target that ignores the walls in front of it is not a target. It is a guess with a dollar sign on it.

Two of my own paper trades made it impossible to ignore. Same logic. Opposite failures.

On LRCX, the target landed about 12% away, and from the day I entered it felt like a different zip code. I exited up around +5%. The target was never reachable — it was just a far-off number the rule had produced.

On ARM, the target sat under 7% away. The stock blew through it and ran more than +21%. The "target" had capped my thinking on a name with real room to move.

One target too far, one too close — and the rule that produced both never once looked at the stock's actual structure. That is not a calibration tweak. That is the wrong question.

What We Changed

We rebuilt how targets work, starting from a principle I would rather say out loud than hide:

A target is a framework for judging reward against risk. It is not a prediction of where a stock will go.

Anyone who tells you they know exactly where a stock will top is selling you something. We are not going to do that. So instead of forecasting a price, the scanner now does two honest things.

First, it frames the reward against your risk. Whatever you are risking down to your stop, the first target is set at twice that, the second at three times. If a setup cannot clear at least two-to-one, that is a flag — the reward does not justify the risk, and you should think hard before taking it at all. This is the math that decides whether a trade is even worth doing.

Second, it reads the path. The scanner now looks at what is actually overhead — prior peaks where buyers got trapped, gaps, the 52-week high — and tells you in plain language how clear the road is: clear path, some resistance, or heavy resistance. A two-to-one target with a clear path is a very different trade than the same target with a wall in the way.

How To Use It

The target is a decision tool, not a promise. A few things I hold to.

Use the reward-to-risk to decide whether to enter — before you ever buy. If the nearest wall is too close to justify the risk, the answer is usually pass, not hope.

Take profits while the stock is still rising. Selling into strength, while there are plenty of buyers, beats waiting for it to roll over and hand the gain back. The target is where you start making that decision — not a level you are chained to.

Let the path set expectations. Heavy resistance overhead means a slower grind and a good reason to bank gains earlier. A clear path means giving a winner more room.

Why I Am Telling You This

I could have quietly fixed this and said nothing. But the entire point of Odd Lot is that the process is visible — including the parts that were broken. LRCX and ARM are in the documented paper trades. You can see the bad targets for yourself. That is the deal: you don't get signals, you get the structure, and you get to watch me tighten it.

A stop tells you where to get out when you're wrong. A target tells you whether the trade was worth taking when you're right. Two different jobs. Now the scanner does both.

---

Note: These field notes are an educational record of one trader's process, not financial advice and not a recommendation to buy or sell any security. Trades referenced are documented for transparency; past results do not predict future outcomes. Trade your own plan.